Hill v. Moe’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 1983
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council · Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776 · NLRB v. Fain-Blatt · Hassett v. Welch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If this were a case marked by violence, intimidation, or imminent threats to public order, then the state courts would he permitted to grant compensation for the consequences as defined by the law of torts. [Citing Garmon II and the Russell case, above, in a footnote.] But the trial court determined that the picketing did not involve those elements of injurious conduct, and we find that the evidence supports such determination. Hence, this area for the exercise of state jurisdiction was not open to the employer.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.