Limeres v. Limeres’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Breck v. Ulmer · Kowalski v. Kowalski · Limeres v. Limeres · Mullen v. Christiansen · Bauman v. State, Division of Family & Youth Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e use our independent judgment to decide whether it was error not to hold an evidentiary hearing,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]e 'will affirm a denial of a modification motion without a hearing if, in our independent judgment, ... the allegations are so general or conclusory ... as to create no genuine issue of material fact requiring a hearing.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schwier v. Schwier“whether a moving party has made a prima facie showing sufficient to justify a custody or child support modification hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schwier v. Schwier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.