Dapremont v. Crossley’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2001
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Di Cristina v. Weiser · Southport Mill, Ltd. v. Ansley · Lamar v. Young · 313 So. 2d 255 - Groghan v. Billingsley · Shell Oil Co. v. Hogan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... the seller shall have the right to declare the deposit, ipso facto, forfeited, without formality beyond tender of title to purchaser, or the seller may demand specific performance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Should purchaser, seller or agent be unable to obtain the loan stipulated above within 45 days from acceptance hereof, this contract shall then be null and void and the agent is hereby authorized to return the purchaser's deposit in full. Commitment by lender to make loan, subject to approval of title, shall constitute obtaining of loan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Timmerman v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.