Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 SO2D 335 - State v. LeBlanc

State v. LeBlanc’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 467 So. 2d 1163 - State v. Hardeman (1985), Hickerson v. Maggio (1982)

1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

17019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on Barrett v. Zweibon · Davis v. Board of School Commissioners · 326 So. 2d 820 - State v. Maduell · 353 So. 2d 1312 - State v. Lemelle · 334 So. 2d 392 - State v. Bizette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person shall be subjected to imprisonment or forfeiture of rights or property without the right of judicial review based upon a complete record of all | ¡^evidence upon which the judgment is based. This right may be intelligently waived. The cost of transcribing the record shall be paid as provided by law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he appearance of impartiality, as well as impartiality itself, outweighs the inconvenience caused by the recusal of the trial judge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A. In a criminal case a judge of any court, trial or appellate, shall be recused when he: (2) ... is related to an attorney employed in the cause or to the district attorney, or to the spouse of either, within the second degree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.