Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 SO2D 828 - Young v. Clement

Young v. Clement’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Wimberly v. Gatch (1994), 439 So. 2d 437 - Gunter v. Plauche (1983)

49 state decisions

21019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 365 So. 2d 322 - Rogers v. State · Henson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. · Young v. Clement

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prescription does not run against one who is ignorant of the existence of facts that would entitle him to bring a malpractice action as long as such ignorance is not willful and does not result from his neglect.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(prescription does not run against one who is ignorant of the existence of facts which would entitle him to bring a malpractice action, as long as such ignorance is not willful and does not result from his neglect. Henson v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 363 So.2d 711 (La.1978). Roy Young ... and his wife both had confidence in Dr. Clement, who had treated her since October of 1970. Mrs. Young had kidney trouble since she was eleven. She had been hospitalized and treated for urinary tract infections. Once she was hospitalized for pain in the kidney area very much like that suffered after the January 26, 1973 operation.... The record discloses no evidence that the Youngs should have suspected that the reason for the blockage of the ureter was a negligent stitch by Dr. Clement.... Young, 367 So.2d at 830 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"Plaintiffs failed to show an ignorance of the factual basis for their claim against the hospital existing in the year before the claim against the hospital was filed."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.