367 So. 2d 974 - Woods v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2014
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Jorn · Wade v. Hunter · Illinois v. Somerville · Turner v. Louisiana · United States v. Josef Perez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'This discretion of the trial court to grant a mistrial includes the discretion to determine the extent and type of investigation requisite to a ruling on the motion. United States v. Flynn , 216 F.2d 354 , 372 (2nd Cir. 1954); Lewis v. United States , 295 F. 441 (1st Cir. 1924); Tillman , supra; Killilea v. United States , 287 F.2d 212 (1st Cir. 1961); United States v. Khoury , 539 F.2d 441 (5th Cir. 1976). A full evidentiary hearing at which witnesses and jurors can be examined and cross examined is not required. Tillman , supra, 406 F.2d at 938 . . . .'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“necessary to preserve the impartiality or even the appearance of impartiality of the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Phillips v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.