Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

367 S.W.2d 334

Dartez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1963-05-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1968

1 state decisions

Relies on 163 Tex. Crim. 553 - Hankins v. State · 171 Tex. Crim. 606 - Freeman v. State · Works v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1963-05-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DICE, Commissioner.

¶1The conviction is for aggravated assault with a motor vehicle; the punishment, two. months in jail and a fine of $300.

¶2A statement of facts in narrative form appears in the record, which is only-approved by counsel for appellant. Not having been agreed to by counsel for both the appellant and the state or approved by-the trial court, as required by Sec. 1, subd. E, Art. 759a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., the same-cannot be considered. Works v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 343 S.W.2d 706.

¶3In the absence of a statement of facts which may be considered, we cannot pass upon the question of admissibility of evidence or the court’s refusal to give a certain requested charge. Freeman v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 352 S.W.2d 833; Hankins v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 553, 294 S.W.2d 850. The record also reflects that no exception, was taken to the court’s refusal to give the requested charge.

¶4All proceedings appear to be regular, and; nothing is presented for review.

¶5The judgment is affirmed.

¶6Opinion approved by the court.

/367/sw2d/334 · .json · Public domain