Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 S.W.2d 337 - Wade v. State

Wade v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1987
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 126 Tex. Crim. 439 - Tipton v. State · 111 Tex. Crim. 500 - Littles v. State · 141 Tex. Crim. 99 - Cantu v. State · McTee v. State · 149 Tex. Crim. 226 - Martin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The mere fact that the witness was present when the crime was committed does not compel the conclusion that he was an accomplice of the accused. Nor is the witness to be deemed an accomplice simply because he knew of the crime, but failed to disclose or even concealed it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.