Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 SW3D 641 - State v. Young

State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bernard · State v. Sladek · State v. Kenley · State v. Madorie · State v. Primm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Additionally, this type of evidence, when it is part of the surrounding circumstances or sequence of events relating to the charged crime, is 'admissible to present a complete and coherent picture of the events that transpired.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In general, evidence of uncharged crimes is not admissible for the purpose of showing the defendant's criminal character or propensity to commit such crimes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “where the evidence of the uncharged crime is both logically and legally relevant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.