Teague v. Van Hollen’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · State v. Pettit · State v. Ndina · Aicher Ex Rel. LaBarge v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund · State v. Wood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he only response of [the Department of Justice] is that it will continue to [release inaccurate records] because there is no law that compels it to do otherwise. In essence, we are doing this to you because we can. That is the response of a bully and not an appropriate response of the government of a democracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“¶95 Section 19.70 informs my analysis because it requires the Department to correct inaccuracies in records containing personally identifiable information. ¶96 When a challenge is made to the accuracy of a record containing personally identifiable information, Wis. Stat. § 19.70 , using the word”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 1 of the Wisconsin Constitution protect[s] against government actions that deprive an individual of life, liberty, or property without due process of the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.