Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 BR 754 - In Re Delbecq

In Re Delbecq’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
February 2014
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 707 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Caminetti v. United States · Garcia v. United States · Zuber v. Allen · Eldred v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(ii) In order to establish special circumstances, the debtor shall be required to itemize each additional expense or adjustment of income and to provide— (I) documentation for such expense or adjustment to income; and (II) a detailed explanation of the special circumstances that make such expenses or adjustment to income necessary and reasonable. (iii) The debtor shall attest under oath to the accuracy of any information provided to demonstrate that additional expenses or adjustments to income are required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “I believe ... that we can ... make sure that soldiers, certain persons with medical conditions, and veterans with low income can qualify under the safe harbor of the bill. I am offering an amendment which clarifies that these individuals who may fall under the special circumstances provisions of the bill are explicitly allowed to be covered. ...” There is nothing further in the debate over the amendment to suggest that Congress otherwise intended these examples to serve as a benchmark for defining”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.