Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 F.2d 1002 - Owsley v. Peyton

Owsley v. Peyton’s Empirical Analysis

368 F.2d 1002 · 1966

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
October 1986
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 1986

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

110196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nathan Thomas v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary · Nathan Thomas v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary · Owsley v. Peyton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The State is quite right that no evidential showing was made to the criminal court of any doubt as to Owsley’s mental condition. However, it appears that his attorney must have been aware that proof of the uncertainty was at hand. The lawyer’s failure to adduce it in court, we think, rendered his representation of Owsley ineffective to the point of depriving him of his Constitutional right to counsel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.