Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 F.2d 111 - Peter v. Public Constructors, Inc.

Peter v. Public Constructors, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

368 F.2d 111 · 1966

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2003

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

3019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The M/v 'Tungus' v. Skovgaard E · McDonald v. Shell Oil Co. · Silveus v. Grossman · McGrath v. Pennsylvania Sugar Co. · Curtis v. A. Garcia y Cia., Ltda.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] reservation of control or the exercise of control by the employer over the details of the independent contractor’s performance may make the employer liable for negligence in the execution of the work ... It should be added that this liability creating right of control is something more than the general right of inspection and supervision that an employer normally enjoys and exercises to make sure that he receives from the contractor the benefit or total performance that was bargained for.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The present record contains no evidence of actual exercise of control by Public [general contractor] over [subcontractor] Reid’s performance of the bridge demolition project. Accordingly, the trial court properly found that there was in fact no such exercise of control. “We think it equally clear that, in contracting with Reid,' Public did not reserve a right to control the way in which Reid would conduct its operations * * * ” 368 F.2d at 113 (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.