Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 F.2d 169 - Heterochemical Corp. v. United States Rubber Co.

Heterochemical Corp. v. United States Rubber Co.’s Empirical Analysis

368 F.2d 169 · 1966

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
March 1980
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 1980

5 federal appellate ·

30196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. · Woodmar Realty Co. v. Julius · Flowers v. Austin-Western Co. · Schnell v. Allbright-Nell Co. · Borg-Warner Corp. v. Mall Tool Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “with appropriate fact and law references.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.