Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

368 F.2d 323

Docket No. 22841.

Gardner v. Hammonds

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

November 10, 1966.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1966-11-10

2 counsel of record

Relies on Hartman Corp. of America v. United States · Certified Associates, Inc. v. Foundation Properties, Inc. · William Joseph Manda, Bankrupt v. Don C. Sinclair, Trustee

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1966-11-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1987

4 federal appellate ·

20196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Macon L. Weaver, U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., Alan S. Rosenthal, Robert J. Vollen, Jack H. Weiner, Attys., Dept. of Justice, John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. William Doolittle, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., L. Wayne Collier, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.

Max C. Pope, Levine, Fulford, Gwaltney & Pope, Birmingham, Ala., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge and THORNBERRY and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

We conclude that the trial court applied the proper standards of review of this case. We concur in its finding that no substantial evidence supports a reversal by the Secretary of his previous determination in favor of the appellee, Mrs. Hammonds. Therefore, the judgment is

¶2

Affirmed.

/368/f2d/323 · .json · Public domain