Walker v. Brough’s Empirical Analysis
368 F.2d 349 · 1966
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1971
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Hamilton v. Alabama · White v. State of Maryland · House v. Mayo · Lee v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In undertaking the representation of Walker his appointed counsel was operating in the dark, through no fault of his own, completely disadvantaged by his lack of vitally important information. He was not in position to provide the effective representation and assistance to which Walker was entitled. Under these circumstances we conclude that we should not “stop to determine whether prejudice resulted.” [368 F.2d supra at 353.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Strike it out and enter a plea of not guilty. Do you have any counsel?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.