Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 F.2d 533 - Gajewski v. United States

Gajewski v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

368 F.2d 533 · 1966

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Booker v. Arkansas (1967), Deckard v. United States (1967)

19 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

110196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United State v. Morgan · Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · Clark v. Memolo · Gajewski v. United States · Azzone v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]rror coram nobis relief should not be granted except under compelling circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was designed only to correct errors `of the most fundamental character'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.