Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 F.2d 57 - King v. Wainwright

King v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis

368 F.2d 57 · 1966

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
December 1978
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Fay v. Noia · Linkletter v. Walker · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Pate v. Holman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The mistake of appellant’s retained counsel in failing to perfect appeal from his judgment of conviction, while regrettable, does not constitute a denial of due process. The applicant was unable to obtain appellate review of his judgment of conviction because of the procedural error committed by his own retained counsel and not because of any action by the State."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.