James Dwain Hampton v. The State of Oklahoma and Ray H. Page, Warden’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

21 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Appellant’s claim that his constitutional rights were violated because he was proceeded against in the state court by information rather than indictment was untenable as a matter of law. Lem Woon v. State of Oregon, 229 U.S. 586 , 33 S.Ct. 783 , 57 L.Ed. 1340 . See, Okla. Const. art. 2, § 17; 22 Okl.St.Ann. § 301.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Stevenson v. State · Williams v. Page

2. ““Mere passage of time does not establish an unconstitutional denial of a speedy trial or due process. * * * nor can a defendant sit by without effort to obtain an earlier trial or himself contribute to the delay and thereafter be heard to complain.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Washington v. State

3. “Mere passage of time does not establish an unconstitutional denial of a speedy trial or due process. * * * [n]or can a defendant sit by without effort to obtain an earlier trial * *.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Basker v. Crouse