San Antonio v. Timko’s Empirical Analysis
368 F.2d 983 · 1966
Citation profile
27 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2004 · most notably Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co. (2004), Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-Appellees (1975)
27 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Braunfeld v. Gibbons · Bryan v. United States · Dick v. New York Life Insurance · New York Cent Co v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]lthough defense counsel did not take exception to this, the impropriety of the argument was so flagrant as to constitute `fundamental error'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.