McKinnie v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
368 F.3d 907 · 2003
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2019
most recently cited
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Zurawski v. Halter · Knight v. Chater · Donahue v. Barnhart · Johansen v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an ALJ may depend on expert testimony only if the testimony is reliable”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the basis of the vocational expert's conclusions is questioned at the hearing ... then the ALJ should make an inquiry (similar though not necessarily identical to that of Rule 702 ) to find out whether the purported expert's conclusions are reliable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Purdy v. Berryhill“A vocational expert is free to give a bottom line, but the data and reasoning underlying that bottom line must be available on demand if the claimant challenges the foundation of the vocational expert's opinions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Krell v. Saul
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.