Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 F.3d 907 - McKinnie v. Barnhart

McKinnie v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

368 F.3d 907 · 2003

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2019
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Zurawski v. Halter · Knight v. Chater · Donahue v. Barnhart · Johansen v. Barnhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an ALJ may depend on expert testimony only if the testimony is reliable”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]f the basis of the vocational expert's conclusions is questioned at the hearing ... then the ALJ should make an inquiry (similar though not necessarily identical to that of Rule 702 ) to find out whether the purported expert's conclusions are reliable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A vocational expert is free to give a bottom line, but the data and reasoning underlying that bottom line must be available on demand if the claimant challenges the foundation of the vocational expert's opinions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.