Negele v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
368 F.3d 981 · 2004
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Regalado-Garcia v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Schellong v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Ferdinand Hammer v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Alicia Wai Ling Tang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Kulle v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny alien who, during the period beginning on March 23, 1933, and ending on May 8, 1945, under the direction of, or in association with ... the Nazi government of Germany ... ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of any person because of race, religion, national origin, or political opinion is inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“under the direction of, or in association with the Nazi government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Higuit v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.