Keith Wilson v. Thomas Bell’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Berger v. United States · United States v. Young · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on trial counsel's failure to object to prosecutorial misconduct 'hinges on whether the prosecutor's misconduct was plain enough for a minimally competent counsel to have objected.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stojetz v. Ishee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.