Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

368 F. App'x 753

Singh v. Holder

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 26, 2010

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-02-26

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Perez v. Mukasey

Decided 2010-02-26

¶1 MEMORANDUM

¶2 Ravinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

¶3 The BIA did not abuse its discretion in construing Singh’s third motion to reopen as seeking reopening of its January 26, 2005, order, and denying the motion as untimely filed and number-barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c).

¶4 Singh’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

¶5 PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

¶6 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

/368/fappx/753 · .json · Public domain