Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

368 N.C. 314

State v. Pendergraft

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 2015

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2015-09-25

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2018

3 state decisions

Relies on Goldston v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-09-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Justice ERVIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/368/nc/314 · .json · Public domain