Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 NC 380 - State v. Packingham

State v. Packingham’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. O'Brien · United States v. Williams · Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union · United States v. Stevens · Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to access a commercial social networking Web site where the sex offender knows that the site permits minor children to become members or to create or maintain personal Web pages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “carefully tailored ... to prohibit registered sex offenders from accessing only those Web sites that allow them the opportunity to gather information about minors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “primary purpose the facilitation of commercial transactions involving goods or services between [their] members or visitors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.