Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 NC 620 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 16913

Relies on State v. Sturdivant · State v. Abraham · State v. Greer · State v. Palmer · In re T.R.P.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “contemporary criminal pleading requirements have been designed to remove from our law unnecessary technicalities which tend to obstruct justice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] plain and concise factual statement in each count which, without allegations of an evidentiary nature, asserts facts supporting every element of a criminal offense and the defendant's commission thereof with sufficient precision clearly to apprise the defendant or defendants of the conduct which is the subject of the accusation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “no longer bound by the 'ancient strict pleading requirements of the common law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.