Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 NC 717 - State v. Crockett

State v. Crockett’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Powell · State v. Mann · State v. Abshire · Lloyd v. Babb · Katherine Inez Hall v. Wake County Board of Elections

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the State presented substantial evidence of each essential element of the offense is a question of law; therefore, we review the denial of a motion to dismiss de novo.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “so Barnett still controls. See id. By showing defendant had been incarcerated for approximately a month and then released, the State established that defendant had a new address, see id. , and thus the trial court properly denied defendant's motion to dismiss. This argument is overruled. IV. Sentencing Defendant next contends that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We now hold that N.C.G.S. § 14-208.9, the change of address statute, and not section 14-208.7, the registration statute, governs the situation when, as here, a sex offender who has already complied with the initial registration requirements is later incarcerated and then released.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.