Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 P2D 224 - Moore v. Cavett

Moore v. Cavett’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 1984
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Living Trust Created by Atwood · State v. Finney · Hempel v. Hempel · Hill v. Hill · Blackhurst v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether the trial court abused its discretion there are two considerations. First, did the defendant give a sufficient reason for not being present at the trial? and, second, assuming that he did, was his presence as a party necessary? (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.