Harvey v. Raines’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1965
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 96 Okla. Crim. 279 - Ex Parte Simmons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Writ of habeas corpus cannot be invoked for the purpose of reviewing the action of courts of record where the court acted within its jurisdiction, nor can the writ of habeas corpus be used for the purpose of correcting irregularities or errors, or as a substitute for an appeal.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shelton v. State · Peeples v. Page
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.