McDoulett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 94 Okla. Crim. 226 - Chaney v. State · 79 Okla. Crim. 437 - Sears v. State · 40 Okla. Crim. 352 - Bynum v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 225 - Trent v. State · 7 Okla. Crim. 4 - Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The constitutional provision guaranteeing one immunity from unlawful search and seizure belongs only to the person, effects and premises of the party whose property is searched, and one accused will not be heard to object that the search of the property or premises of some third person is a violation of his constitutional rights.” See Combs v. State, 94 Okl.Cr. 206 , 233 P.2d 314 ; Sears v. State, 79 Okl.Cr. 437 , 156 P.2d 145 ; Bynum v. State, 40 Okl.Cr. 352 , 268 P. 993 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.