Pinckney v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
December 2016
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hughey · State v. Pinckney · State v. Austin · Cartrette v. State · State v. Peterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Further, there is no requirement that the intent element is satisfied only by proving an intent to commit .the specific crime that is charged in the indictment as an aggravating circumstance. The only requirement is that there be intent to commit any crime at the time of . entry.”). 105 . See Devaughn v. State, 749 S.W.2d 62 , 65 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988) (en banc) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.