Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 So. 2d 305 - Perry v. State

368 So. 2d 305 - Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2005 · most notably 698 So. 2d 189 - Smith v. State (1996), 515 So. 2d 55 - Kinder v. State (1986)

32 state decisions

1901978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shadle v. State · Doss v. State · Miller v. State · Skumro v. State · 43 Ala. App. 454 - Leonard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The granting or denying of a motion for mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial judge because he is in a much better position to determine what effect, if any, some occurrence may have had upon the jury's ability to decide the defendant's fate fairly and justly. This is particularly true where a disturbance at the trial is not completely incorporated into the record as in the present case. We will not interfere with the trial judge unless there has been a clear abuse of his discretion. . . ." Perry v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 368 So.2d 305 (1978), rev'd on other grounds, 368 So.2d 310 (1979).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “it must clearly appear that the witness in question is an accomplice. Ross v. State , 74 Ala. 532 (1883); Lowery v. State , 38 Ala. App. 505 , 88 So.2d 854 (1956).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the fact that the evidence without material conflict disclosed that the appellant and his cohorts robbed the bank in question ,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.