Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 So. 2d 719 - State v. Johnson

368 So. 2d 719 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably 414 So. 2d 741 - State v. Huizar (1982), 414 So. 2d 306 - State v. Fuller (1982)

24 state decisions

18019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gatlin · 343 So. 2d 712 - State v. Elzie · 339 So. 2d 764 - State v. May · State v. Daniels · 312 So. 2d 318 - State v. Elam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “La.R.S. 14:10(1). Proof of specific intent is required where the statutory definition of a crime includes the intent to produce or accomplish some prescribed consequence. State v. Johnson, 368 So.2d 719 (La.1979); State v. Elzie, 343 So.2d 712 (La.1977). If we replace the word battery with its statutory definition, second degree battery becomes”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “A. Armed robbery is the theft of anything of value from the person of another or which is in the immediate control of another, by use of force or intimidation, while armed with a dangerous weapon.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.