Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 SO2D 918 - State v. Duda

State v. Duda’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 354 So. 2d 890 - State v. Kurtz · 350 So. 2d 1104 - State v. Abrams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It seems clear that although appellee did not explicitly move for a continuance the court and the state took his (appellee’s) reference to “possibly” asking for a continuance as a specific request to continue the case. Had defendant objected at the time it might well have been that the court would not have continued the case but, by remaining silent, appellee in effect acquiesced in the understanding of all the parties that appellee was seeking a continuance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.