Meadowes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 1987
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 166 Tex. Crim. 231 - King v. State · 159 Tex. Crim. 228 - Jackson v. State · Urteago v. State · 161 Tex. Crim. 273 - Browning v. State · 166 Tex. Crim. 580 - Sutton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We haven’t heard from Mr. Frost on this thing. We certainly couldn’t use him, couldn’t try. I think the State could have very handily if they had wanted to, but we didn’t get to hear from him.” (emphasis ours.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bailey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.