Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 U.S. 464 - Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

7,025
cited by 7,025 later decisions
49
cited 49 times by the Supreme Court
32
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

1,877 federal appellate · 1,157 district · 253 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7,025 later decisions (49 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. (1986), Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (2007)

1,877 federal appellate · 1,157 district · 253 state decisions — followed in 32 states

2.6k01962197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedPoller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)

Relies on Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. · Times-Picayune Pub Co v. United States · Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. · Eastman Kodak Co of New York v. Southern Photo Materials Co

Cited together with First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States · Continental Inc v. Gte Sylvania Incorporated

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7,025 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “summary procedures should be used sparingly in complex antitrust litigation where motive and intent play leading roles, the proof is largely in the hands of the alleged conspirators, and hostile witnesses thicken the plot.”
    176 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is no genuine issue as to material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    146 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that [he] is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    108 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.