Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 368 U.S. 52 - Hamilton v. Alabama

Hamilton v. Alabama’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

2,582
cited by 2,582 later decisions
107
cited 107 times by the Supreme Court
50
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

863 federal appellate · 80 district · 1,046 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,582 later decisions (107 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Chapman v. State of California (1967), Boykin v. Alabama (1969)

863 federal appellate · 80 district · 1,046 state decisions — followed in 50 states

1.3k01961197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Williams v. Kaiser · Crain v. United States · House v. Mayo

Cited together with White v. State of Maryland · Gideon v. Wainwright · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · United States v. Wade · Escobedo v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,582 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the degree of prejudice can never be known”
    45 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a)rraignment has differing consequences in the various jurisdictions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “denied relief because there was no showing or effort to show that petitioner was `disadvantaged in any way by the absence of counsel.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.