In Re Mullen’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 702 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Relies on BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation · In Re Hardacre · In Re Alexander · In Re Jass · In Re Slusher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This is clear; there can be no doubt about it. Section 1325(b)(2) states what the definition of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Chapter 13 is not some alternative universe where reality dare not intrude.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“appear in the referenced subsection. Unless the definition applies to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.