Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 F.2d 150 - Carl Junior Hackathorn v. J.E. (Bill) Decker

Carl Junior Hackathorn v. J.E. (Bill) Decker’s Empirical Analysis

369 F.2d 150 · 1967

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2010

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

100196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Rogers v. Richmond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * the judge here did not categorically state that the confessions were voluntarily given * * * the record leaves no doubt that he did, in fact, find from the evidence presented to him on that issue that the confessions were voluntarily given when he overruled defendant's motion to exclude them from evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.