Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 F.2d 220 - United States v. Rohalla

United States v. Rohalla’s Empirical Analysis

369 F.2d 220 · 1966

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1978
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Gordon v. United States · Southern Railway Co. v. Jackson · United States v. Manton · Leahy v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since defendant's counsel did not assure this Court that 'a good faith dispute exists' about the accuracy of this secondary evidence, its receipt 'must be classed as harmless error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.