Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 F.2d 408 - Edward L. Engelhardt v. Claude I. Judd, Alexander E. Drukker and John H. Biel

Edward L. Engelhardt v. Claude I. Judd, Alexander E. Drukker and John H. Biel’s Empirical Analysis

369 F.2d 408 · 1966

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
September 1994
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 1994

1 district ·

1401966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mason v. Hepburn · Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. Treves · Robert C. Woofter v. Vernon E. Carlson · Archer v. Papa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the cases are in all full accord that each case of alleged suppression and concealment must be considered and decided on its own facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.