Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

369 F.2d 810

Docket No. 23090.

Waldrop v. United States

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 13, 1966.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1966-12-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1966

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1966-12-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Thomas M. Haas, Mobile, Ala., for appellant.

¶2D. Broward Segrest, Asst. U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., for appellee.

¶3*811Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and GOLDBERG, District Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5There was more than ample evidence to warrant submission to the jury the question whether appellant was guilty as an aider and abettor of the bank robbery for which she was convicted. There being no substantial legal questions raised on the appeal, the judgment is

¶6Affirmed.

/369/f2d/810 · .json · Public domain