Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 F.2d 842 - Scott v. Fancher

Scott v. Fancher’s Empirical Analysis

369 F.2d 842 · 1966

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2015
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2015 · most notably Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger (1978), Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories (1974)

30 federal appellate · 3 district ·

220196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Millers' National Insurance Company, Chicago, Illinois, and Cross-Appellees v. The Wichita Flour Mills Company, and Cross-Appellant. The Wichita Flour Mills Company, and Cross-Appellant v. Millers' National Insurance Company, Chicago, Illinois, and Cross-Appellees · L. N. Childress and Roger W. Crampton v. E. A. Cook, Jr. · Simmons v. Hunter · Reagan v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, the admission of . tendered expert testimony is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court, and the action of the trial court in admitting or excluding such evidence will be sustained unless clearly and manifestly erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “By definition cross-claims must be closely related to the existing action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.