United States v. Ballinger

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 2004.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2004-05-12

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2005

5 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46

Relies on United States v. Ballinger

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-05-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Paul S. Kish, Fed. Pub. Def., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

¶2Amy Levin Weil, Atlanta, GA, Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Atty., Office of Dept. Atty. Gen., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

¶3Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.*

¶5BY THE COURT:

¶6A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶7IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. *1239The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.