Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 F.3d 475 - Victoria W. v. Larpenter

Victoria W. v. Larpenter’s Empirical Analysis

369 F.3d 475 · 2004

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Samford v. Dretke (2009), Jones v. Salt Lake County (2007)

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

160200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Estelle v. Gamble · Farmer v. Brennan · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Bell v. Wolfish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ... subjects, or causes to be subjected, any ... person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) deprivation of a right secured by the U.S. Constitution or federal law, (2) that occurred under color of state law, and (3) was caused by a state actor.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]t is not enough for a § 1983 plaintiff merely to identify conduct properly attributable to the municipality. The plaintiff must also demonstrate that, through its deliberate conduct, the municipality was, the `moving force' behind the injury alleged. That is, a plaintiff must show that the municipal action was taken with the requisite degree of culpability and must demonstrate a direct causal link between the municipal action and the deprivation of federal rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.