United States v. Beverly’s Empirical Analysis
369 F.3d 516 · 2004
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Batson v. Kentucky · Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 140 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The indictment or information may charge 2 or more defendants if they are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction, or in the same series of acts or transactions, constituting an offense or offenses. The defendants may be charged in one or more counts together or separately. All defendants need not be charged in each count.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“1) whether the expert’s scientific technique or theory can be, or has been, tested; 2) whether the technique or theory has been subject to peer review and publication; 3) the known or potential rate of error of the technique or theory when applied; 4) the existence and maintenance of standards and controls; and 5) whether the technique or theory has been generally accepted in the scientific community.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is necessary to view the conduct at issue within the context of the trial as a whole.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.