Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 F.3d 83 - Rich v. Maranville

Rich v. Maranville’s Empirical Analysis

369 F.3d 83 · 2004

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Gozlon-Peretz v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Johnson v. United States · United States v. O'Neil · United States v. Reyes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Special parole] differs from regular parole in three respects: 'first, special parole follows the term of imprisonment, while regular parole entails release before the end of the term; second, special parole was imposed, and its length selected, by the district judge rather than by the Parole Commission;' third, if the conditions of special parole are violated, the parolee is returned to prison to serve the entire special parole term, and receives no credit for his time spent in non-custodial supervision, or ‘street time.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the coun-terintuitive effect of allowing a special parole violator to attain less stringent regular parole terms, not as a result of good behavior, but instead as' a result of a special parole violation.”). 4 . Fillingham also argues that the Commission should not have considered the United Kingdom conviction because it was the result of a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 abolished all forms of federal parole for offenses committed after November 1, 1987.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.