Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 F.3d 833 - Kennedy

Kennedy’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Williams v. Riley (2008), David Stratta v. Billy Harris (2020)

5 district ·

260200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Rl v. Ct · Scanlan · Dale Brown · Ware v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The FCRA] permits a creditor to make a “conditional” firm offer of credit; that is, an offer that is conditioned on the consumer meeting the creditor’s previously-established criteria for extending credit.... [A] firm offer of credit under the Act really means a firm offer if you meet certain criteria.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any offer of credit ... to a consumer that will be honored if the consumer is determined, based on information in a consumer report on the consumer, to meet the specific criteria used to select the consumer for the offer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Any person who uses a consumer report on any consumer in connection with any credit ... transaction that is not initiated by the consumer, that is provided to that person under section 1681b(c)(1)(B) of this title, shall provide with each written solicitation made to the consumer regarding the transaction a clear and conspicuous statement that — (A) information contained in the consumer's consumer report was used in connection with the transaction; (B) the consumer received the offer of credit or insurance because the consumer satisfied the criteria for credit worthiness... under which the consumer was selected for the offer; (C) if applicable, the credit or insurance may not be extended if, after the consumer responds to the offer, the consumer does not meet the criteria used to select the consumer for the offer or any applicable criteria bearing on credit worthiness... or does not furnish any required collateral; (D) the consumer has a right to prohibit information contained in the consumer's file with any consumer reporting agency from being used in connection with any credit ... transaction that is not initiated by the consumer; and (E) the consumer may exercise the right referred to in subparagraph (D) by notifying a notification system established under section 1681b(e) of this title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.