Moore v. Dretke’s Empirical Analysis
369 F.3d 844 · 2004
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2023
17 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · Reyes-Requena v. United States · Benitez v. Mata · Quiller v. Byrd · United States v. Lara
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The applicant bears the burden of demonstrating that the petition does in fact comply with [AEDPA], and the district court shall dismiss the petition unless that showing is made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Osborne v. Hall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.